286
Treatment & Preventative Meds / Re: Nosodes....Need opinions
« on: July 06, 2006, 06:47:51 pm »I am not here to suggest that everything offered in the market is effective and valid without a clinical trial - sure you have seen things that don't work. I can think of scores as well. But I also know better than to think a clinical trial is any guarantee of anything either. Does it work in practice or doesn't it? Thirty years of widespread practice isn't meaningless and there are studies, albeit few on nosodes for those interested in looking.
For those who need clinical trials, then nosodes and anything else not blind trialed, will not be attractive to you. Depends on your mindset. I know that those who come from deeply rooted scientific families cannot let go of this and find it difficult to grasp - that's ok. I am not here to advocate following anything blindly, without due diligence and research, whether traditional or alternative. I do not understand however the mind that has been taught to trust a purchased clinical trial over practical real-life experience. 1,000 people telling me something consistent will always mean more to me than someone's clinical trial.
I do not personally use nosodes myself because they aren't necessary for me, but neither are vaccines and at least nosodes are the disease, nothing but the disease and no other chemicals, formaldehyde, brain tissues and bacterias. This is what is harmful. If everyone is making a choice to vaccinate because they understand how they work, what they do in the body, their failure rate, their health risks, their duration of immunity, and the true incidence and risk of disease to determine if they are even needed - then great - I will always respect that. I do not denounce the notion of vaccination - just the safety and necessity of current vaccines.
As for the last poster's reports on the low number of vaccine suits deemed valid - I have to choose to not debate that but ask everyone to use their own common sense here as well. People inject a vaccine into their animal or child every single day - and anything other than immediate anaphylactic shock is deemed "unproven connection" by the CDC. I have seen suits denied for kids balloned up and covered in boils following vaccination, and dogs who developed conditions within days that are consistently and systemically reported by well-known immunologists as vaccine consistent and still - "unproven connection" because in the end, what proof can you provide? An easy defense.
Countless doctors have spoken up to say it was vaccine induced. Many other countries have banned several vaccines still used in the U.S. knowing they are harmful and the U.K. has documented vaccine damage for decades starting with the vaccine induced small-pox outbreak there. Polio today is solely caused by the vaccine here - about 400 cases per year and dogs routinely suffer acute neurological damage from the neurological vaccines (distemper and rabies). It is far too much to go into here but there is so much information out there if people want to review both sides and consider it all for themselves.