OK.
After reading the articles that ARE NOT on animal rights or animal welfare sites, and with my limited exposure to this, I am going to have to say that I can't form an opinion, and I'm surprised that so many others have been able to.
Nobody was there besides the landscapers and the wife, and the dogs. Only THEY know what happened.
I just know that Cabeza wouldn't do that, and I wouldn't want him to. I'm sorry, but a dog that attacks to the point of mauling and does not stop when the owner calls them off is a little sketchy, in my opinion.
OH, and I just want to add that somehow, people seem to be really hung up on the fact that the guys attacked were illegal aliens. Does that somehow change things? Not to me. That part is irrelevent.
I'm sorry, I'm not trying to stir up controversy, but this whole thing irritates me. Could be the pregnant hormones, I guess.
There's just a LOT there that I think many of us (under different circumstances, and if the animal rights groups didn't tell us to SAVE CONGO!!!) would find objectionable. For example, why did this guy have a whole pack of dogs in his yard? Puppies and the like? Is he a BYB? Why wasn't Congo neutered? Why wasn't he trained to be called off when the owners called him off?